According to another, frequently cited, definition by Gerald Dworkin, it is "the interference with a person's liberty of action justified by reasons referring exclusively to
The philosopher Gerald Dworkin has defined paternalism as “the interference of a state or an individual with another person, against their will, and justified by a claim that the person interfered with be better off or protected from harm.” 7 (The agent need not be limited to the “state” or an “individual” but can include an institution or a group of individuals in specific roles.)
Dworkin thinks that Mill’s utilitarian arguments against paternalism are fine as far as they go. Government paternalism generally will leave people worse off because individuals know more about what will make their lives go well than the government does. But for many of the cases listed on p. 282, it’s hard to make that case.
An article in the New York Times "Are these 10 Lies Justified?" 2. Gerald Dworkin, "Paternalism," in Philosophy of Law, ed. Joel Feinberg and Hyman Gross (Encino, Calif.: Dickenson Publishing Co., 1975); and Joel Feinberg, "Legal Paternalism," Canadian Journal of Philosophy 1 (1971): 105 -24. (The quote from Feinberg in this paragraph occurs on p. 113.) 3. Dworkin thinks that Mill’s utilitarian arguments against paternalism are fine as far as they go. Government paternalism generally will leave people worse off because individuals know more about what will make their lives go well than the government does.
• Just so we’re on the same page… • (cf. Dworkin) An agent A acts paternalistically towards a patient P if and only if A implements an interference with P’s liberty or autonomy, Z, against P’s will or without P’s knowledge, such that Z promotes P’s well-being, goals, or interests W • Here focus on well-being, as understood in the Nudge literature Paternalism. Totawa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld, 1983.
11 Apr 2014 having made objectification an important feature of the Feminist lexicon is Andrea Dworkin. Here are a few quotes attributed to Miss Dworkin:.
(2) A theory of paternalism must answer at least three interre? lated questions about paternalism in a way that Relevance of being rational and fully informed to whether paternalism is justified It is the duty of a rational person to impose paternalism on those who are not rational.
Chapter 1 - Defining paternalism. By Gerald Dworkin. Edited by Christian Coons, Bowling Green State University, Ohio, Michael Weber, Bowling Green State
Dworkin On Paternalism. LIBERTY AND PATERNALISM John Stuart Mill and Gerald Dworkin have distinctly opposing views on legal paternalism in that Mill is adamantly against any form of paternalism, whereas Dworkin believes that there do exist circumstances in which paternalism is justified. paternalism, including those of John Stuart Mill, Gerald Dworkin, and Joel Feinberg, are seriously defective. This is due to their neglect of two basic methodological points ((2) and (3)) about developing a theory of paternalism. (2) A theory of paternalism must answer at least three interre?
lated questions about paternalism in a way that
Paternalism, by Peter Suber. From Philosophy of Law: An Encyclopedia, edited by Christopher Berry Gray, Garland Pub. Co., 1999, vol. II, pp.
Vad ar svenskt naringsliv
Gerald Dworkin, professor of philosophy at the University of California-Davis, examines John What is the difference between “pure” and “impure” paternalism?. Outline of Dworkin on Paternalism (in James White text). Paternalism = limitations on personal freedom or choice, done to benefit the person.
113.) 3.
Serviceyrken corona
vägledningscentrum malmö boka tid
lön fältassistent
fornybare energikilder presentasjon
löneläge financial controller
skorpor i harbotten
larare fritidshem distans
Paternalism Individual DWORKIN, Gerald. A “Nudge” for Public Health Ethics : Libertarian Paternalism as a Framework for Ethical Analysis of Public Health
leaving one’s financially irresponsible adult child money in the form of a trust controlled by someone LIBERTY AND PATERNALISM John Stuart Mill and Gerald Dworkin have distinctly opposing views on legal paternalism in that Mill is adamantly against any form of paternalism, whereas Dworkin believes that there do exist circumstances in which paternalism is justified.